Industrial Revolution Essay -- essays research papers

The most far-reaching, influential transformation of clement culture since the approaching of agriculture eight or ten thousand years ago, was the industrial regeneration of eighteenth century Europe. The consequences of this rotary motion would de diverge irrevocably human labor, consumption, family structure, social structure, and even the very soul and thoughts of the exclusive. This revolution involved much than technology to be sure, there had been industrial "revolutions" throughout European archives and non-European history. In Europe, for instance, the twelfth and thirteenth centuries truism an fusillade of techno system of logical association and a consequent change in production and labor. However, the industrial revolution was more than technology-impressive as this technology was. What drove the industrial revolution were indistinct social changes, as Europe moved from a primarily hoidenish and rural prudence to a capitalist and urban economy, from a household, family-based economy to an industry-based economy. This required rethinking social obligations and the structure of the family the abandonment of the family economy, for instance, was the most dramatic change to the structure of the family that Europe had ever undergone-and were still struggling with these changes. In 1750, the European economy was overwhelmingly an agricultural economy. The land was owned largely by wealthy and frequently aristocratic landowners they leased the land to tenant farmers who give for the land in real goods that they grew or produced. Most non-agricultural goods were produced by individual families that specialized in one set of skills wagon-wheel manufacture, for instance. Most capitalist act focused on mercantile activity rather than production there was, however, a growing manufacturing industry growing up just about the logic of mercantilism. The European economy, though, had become a global economy. In our efforts to try to beg of f why the Industrial Revolution took place, the globalization of the European economy is a compelling explanation. European trade and manufacture stretched to every continent merely Antarctica this vast increase in the market for European goods in part drove the conversion to an industrial, manufacturing economy. Why other nations didnt initi aloney join this revolution is in part explained by the monopolistic control that the Europeans exerted... ...ine in 1763 this modify chamber condensed the travel so the cylinder itself didnt have to be cooled. procure in 1769, Watts travel engine had the efficiency to be applied to all kinds of industries. He was not, however, good at doing busines and it was only when he had teamed up with the businessman, Matthew Boulton, that the steam engine began to change the face of English manufacture. By 1800, Watt and Boulton sell 289 of these new engines by the middle of the next century, the steam engine replaced wet as the major source of m otive power in England and Europe. The changes that the steam engine wrought, however, is a story for another day. And it is here, with 289 steam engines pumping and steaming around England that well leave the story of the Industrial Revolution-half-completed, you might say. The nineteenth century saw the exporting of the Industrial Revolution to Europe in the decades after 1830, and the explosion of factory-based, technology driven manufacture. The Age of Absolutism and the waning years of the sagacity saw Europe just beginning a new level in its history, one that would irreperably severe it from the traditions and certainties of the past.