After reading the novel "Of Mice And Men", by John Steinbeck, do you think George Milton should be found guilty of the murder of Lennie Small?

Anyone would help their best friend if they needed some jack, pass on what if they needed to be put to rest? George Milton is not conscience-smitten for the murder of his friend, Lennie Small, in the novel Of Mica and Men by John Steinbeck. George should be proven exonerated because of three reasons; Curley would depart brutally murdered Lennie, George had to stop Lennie from unintentionally hurting others, and it was Georges duty to end Lennies derogatory life. If George did not overcome Lennie in the easy way he did, then Curley would have murdered him in a pugnacious and belligerent way that was filled with indignation. On page 96, Curley retorted, Ill kill the big son-of-a-bitch myself. Ill shoot im in the guts. This link shows that Curley was going out to murder Lennie. Also, it shows that George knew Curley was going to murder him painfully, so George knew he had to get it over with humanely. The second reason George is unreserved is that if he did not do what he did, the number of Lennies unintended victims would continue to add up. On page nine, Lennie said, They was so little. Id tap em, and pretty soon they bit my fingers and I pinched their heads a little and then they was dead---because they was so little.

In this quote you plume up that whenever the soft thing that Lennie had writhed, contorted, or cringed, he embarrassed it. He has done it to mice, puppies, and women. So, George had to stop Lennie from doing these things, even if they were accidents. The most definitive evidence is that George is the only person who had a right to kill Lennie, so it wa s not murder. On page 61, Candy stated, I o! ught to of rotating shaft that dog... If you want to get a full essay, evidence it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper