AIDS and Ethical Treatment of Infected Patients

IntroductionThis paper will examine the respectable issues related to adult male immunodeficiency virus/AIDS testing, tr havement, and research. Key issues analyzed include confidentiality, cognizant consent, and subvert of life, research design, conflict of interest, vulnerable populations, and vaccine research. Although umteen examples atomic number 18 drawn from the United States, these issues ar also explored from a globular perspective. Major U.S. and international ratified statutes, regulations, and guidance documents provide the linguistic context for the analysis and recommendations. Overview of good PrinciplesThere are ternary widely know principles in American bioethics that apply to both clinical and research ethics: watch for persons, beneficence, and justice. Respect for persons entails respecting the decisions of autonomous persons and protecting persons who deficiency decision do capacity and therefore are not autonomous. It also imposes an pact to tr eat persons with respect by maintaining confidences and safekeeping promises. Beneficence imposes a positive obligation to act in the best interests of patients or research participants. It often is tacit to collect that the risks of research be minimized and that the risks be acceptable in light of the effectiveness benefits of research. Finally, justice requires that people be toughened fairly. It is often understood to require that benefits and burdens be distributed fairly at heart society. (Lo, 2000)Although the ethical principles are useful guidelines that help to focus discussion, they cannot be automatically applied.

Nor are they absolute; exce! ptions to the principles may be conquer in particular cases. Furthermore, they often conflict. Accordingly, these ethical principles must be interpreted in the context of specific cases. (Beauchamp, 1994) Although appeal to these three principles is the dominant allele onward motion in American bioethics, other glide slopees eat been suggested and vary dramatically according to different trains of philosophic cast:?The utilitarian perspective embodies the idea that acts should be evaluated according to their consequences. ?The deontological approach stresses that... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper