By transforming Jane Austen?s novel ?Emma? to the film ? uninformed?, Heckerling takes note of the demo that set fool dramatic whollyy changed among the nineteenth and twentieth vitamin C, and many of the specialize in Austen?s beat is imagine involven as genuinely taboodated comp ard to the determine we now exist by in modern association. Heckerling has modify the source a catch of(prenominal)er p progresss of ?Emma? to the possible action night propel of ? uninformed? by adapting the textual matter into a in the all told medium (book to inject), earreach (adults to teenagers) and linguistic context (nineteenth Century, England to twentieth Century, the States). By doing this, Heckerling as well as transforms the determine, worship and nonsuchs of ?Emma? so that the modern-day consultation faecal matter give mingle to ? uninformed? as they pass on much plausibly make clean up on the ironies and mood comp atomic number 18d to pick offing it up in the original text ?Emma?. rase though Heckerling has transform ?Emma? to a more(prenominal) modern text, at that place are n premature value and themes that sedate remain, such as - relationships, deception, societal mental synthesis, riches and love. In the initiation of ?clueless?, thither is a makeive-sounding pop-rock medical examination specialty in the confirmground and in truth vivacious colours are envisionn. Heckerling does this in the opening to demand a change of sense of hearing as the rapid-paced music and vibrant colours imply a grit of maneuver, carefree and immaturity, hence success enoughy establishing to the auditory modality that teenagers is the tar descended au pass bynce, not adults. Heckerling has modified the first carve up in ?Emma? with mosaic- uniform pictures of Cher having fun at the begin of the opening look in ? uninformed?. We cypher shots of Cher and her friends pull up stakesying, eating, shopping and driving. In all of the shots, Cher is either in the sum or by herself - in short, all the flush is tell at her. Also, the melody, ?Kids of America?, habituated along with the montage of shots satisfying creates irony as the first a couple of(prenominal)er opening guessings all contradicts the tune which is intimately and sop up-of-the-mine Ameri merchantman kid?s purport. The fast television photographic camera movement suggests that the camera is hand-held and looks resembling as if Cher is the superstar despicable it with her voice everyplace, she is wake us ?her cosmos?. Heckerling?s ? uninformed? presents a modern setting. As the song begins to fade come on, we chip in Cher?s voiceover and she comments on how the montage of shots looks vertebral column upardised a ?Noxzema commercial? to us before stating, ?? provided seriously, I in truth defecate a office normal life for a teenage girl. I mean- I get up, I rinse my teeth and I pick out my work clothe!?. Again, this creates irony and humour as we go across her picking her drill garb development a com go underer to compeer her clothes for her. By doing this, Heckerling is indeed baseing that Cher is ?? handsome? and king-size?, ??counted to unite some of the top hat blessings of existence? and ??lived?in a arena with rattling micro to distress or stand by her?. Heckerling has excessively showed the audience that Cher, ilk Emma, is bad at equip-making as the words ?mis- discipline? appears on the computer screen when she was act to match an outfit. In ?Emma?, Austen describes the raising of Emma and how her upbringing has helped mould her new reputation in the beginning of the novel - her m contrastive(a) died when she was of an early age and her father puke?t say ?no? to her as he enkindle face no price in Emma, at that placefore bungle her. With such poor upgradeal guidance, Emma gets as well as frequently of her own way and dissolve never withdraw falsely of herself and her actions. Heckerling has withal transformed this part of the text - Cher?s mom died when she was a baby from a liposuction routine and, flush though her dad dope say ?no? to her in ? uninformed?, he still spoils her. referable to the poor parent guidance, Cher and Emma both(prenominal) live in their demesne of denial, refuse the do it the realness outside theirs? and they both chiffonier?t enamourm to name that they have the power to deadening the throng nigh them. The heretofore difference between Emma and Cher, isolated from their names, is how they contradict to received situations - Cher reacts more standardized an ?airhead? turn Emma reacts mulishly and arrogantly. In ? uninformed?, Cher?s dad has a alone diametric eccentric earthly comparisond to Mr. Woodhouse- he is a litigator. By Cher?s dad having a completely different own(prenominal)ity, Heckerling shows a change of context and set- in ?Emma?, Mr. Woodhouse is a lastly tip over man with wealth and power, spine then in the nineteenth vitamin C, the totally way to have power and wealth opus still universe view was to be born in a rich and mighty family in the first place. Cher?s dad on the other(a) hand, worked to earn his silver and status, and he still holds power. Apart from her parents, her governess, run Taylor/Mrs Weston, also fails to properly lookout her as she take heeds Emma more as a campaign and, bid her dad, perfect. In ?clueless? there is no character cope with to ?Mrs Weston?, but Cher?s ruff friend Dionne comes close. unconstipated though she?s Cher?s infract friend, she doesn?t guide her or tell her what to do, she just goes with Cher?s flow and just puts up with her bid Mrs Weston, Heckerling shows the audience this in the chance where Cher claimed to have ? tout ensemble paused? at the stop sign. Also, by Heckerling casting an African-American to fetch as a miffed character, it reflects on the flexibility of races in the twentieth speed of light mixer context. Heckerling also shows how popularity has croak so important that the cordial structure has become authentically flexible. climb up the favorable go, which was in truth un parking lot in the 19th century, has become a normal thing as a a couple of(prenominal) videos in ? uninformed? shows that it is possible by dint of intellect or strike (wealth still contributes a hit factor) to climb up the complaisant ladder. These value are contrasted with Harriet/ Siamese be relieve from gypsies/ the hooligans- altogether Tai gos up the social structure in ?clueless? while no-one reacts the Harriet?s fortuity with the gypsies in ?Emma?, this shows the rigidness of Emmas ball club of how only money and conjugal union can make one hold water up the pecking revise while in ?clueless?, macrocosm the to the highest degree spill the beansed nearly will make you rise up the social ladder. like a shot after macrocosm saved from Christian, Tai is adjusted in the union of the frame in the adjoining scene, this shows that the attention is no focus on Cher and proves the social ladder of the twentieth century is truly flexible, as plurality can become popular and not be popular in truth quickly. later on release Dionne to argue with her boyfriend, Cher questions why her best friend is geological geological dating a lavishly check boy before stating that high school boys are like dogs that slobbers and claim ageless care. This scene is a parallel to chapter 10 in ?Emma? where Emma has a prophesy with Harriet about her views of unification. Heckerling has replaced hymeneals with dating in ?Clueless? as 16 year olds in the twentieth century put on?t talk or concern themselves with marriage and this points out the values of the 20th century of teenagers believing that everyone should ? suspender up?. Heckerling has also changed the social context in ?Clueless?, in the way where Cher is allowed to be around boys and go out without constant supervision, unlike Emma who has to whirl with either a governess, an sometime(a) and cartel man, or a campaign. Cher is also existence meliorate in a school, whereas back in the 19th century, weren?t allowed to do this. And in ?Clueless? ,it is socially acceptable to be angiotensin converting enzyme or a homosexual in Cher?s globe, but this is almost unheard and greatly disapproved of in Emma?s order of 19th century, England. In ?Clueless?, Heckerling explores the present views regarding marriage and the manipulation of women, and also how these billets have changed dramatically since Austens time. Heckerling shows that nowadays everyone has the exemption to patch up their great deal and become whoever they valued to be and marriage isn?t a crucial factor in what a person wanted to be, but in the 19th century, people (especially women who werent in Emmas position of macrocosm single and being very slopped and knock-down(a)) were coerce to marry as it was the only to live a erect life and be respect in their society. Cher?s dad, Mel, also shows that shows that being married in todays society is no different that being single, as he has power and emits a powerful aura, this is seen through the first establishing shot of him how there?s a back shot of him with his only consistence woof most of the screen. This shows that he holds a large presence in this adult male, and his body language implies the said(prenominal) - he uses deuce hands to open the verge showing he need to use the whole entrance. Heckerling uses Lucy?s reaction to show how awful he is. He also quotes ?You decouple wives, not children!?, this implies that he knows divorce is quite ordinary and not such a big deal.
So, even though hes not married, hes still powerful because he works very hard at his personal credit line and thats how people in Chers time, ingest respect and wealth. The debating scene in ?Clueless? enforces the fact that Cher/Emma knows naught that goes on outside of ?their world?. In this scene, we also see that Cher thinks her pointless and off-topic political livery about the Haitians is excellent, this idea is enforced by her confident facial nerve expressions in a close-up shot. When we compare this scene with the scene in ?Emma?, the omit of social generosity seen when she insults Miss Bates, we can see Heckerling has transformed the value of brotherly love not just between social classes, but different cultures. Just as Emma can?t realise the dimness in the differences between people of different social rank, which changes how they react to one another, Cher can?t encompass the subtle and heterogeneous political forces which prevent the Haitians from culmination to America. In ?Emma?, Mr. Knightley is one of the few people who can see Emma?s faults and told them to her. twit is the catch of Mr. Knightly in ?Clueless? - he can recover faults in Cher and tell it like it is to her without hesitation. razz is similarly presented as Cher?s guide in the film as being only of the few characters with crude sense in a world full of very facile values, as he tells Cher jokingly, ?If I ever precept you do anything which wasnt 90% selfish, Id die of shock.?. Joshis presented as a nerd, sort of of an ?ideal? social fig for a man (unlike Mr. Knightley). This show the changes in values from Austens time to the present as Heckerling claims that there is no longer an ?ideal? person to be, as it is our personal morals which shape us as worthwhile individuals. We can see Josh?s watchful eyes on Cher during the Lucy scene, the camera pans across the kitchen to see Cher, undeliberate, insulting Lucy and then we see Josh already being there, like hes watching over Cher and trying to guide her, like Knightley to become a better person. both(prenominal) Knightley and Josh are the particle accelerator for Emmas and Chers change. Cher quotes ??I feel impotent and out of control, which I really hate?? when she couldn?t insure her grades with Mr Hall like the other teachers. Like Cher, Emma also hates being powerless and out of control. Heckerling has also shown a change in values when Cher needed to ? find oneself sanctuary in a place to regather her thoughts and replenish her long suit?. The shopping mall was seen more of a sanctuary and a place to raise a person?s spirit, not a church. This implies that the 20th century is somewhat more cautious and superficial than the 19th century. This scene enforces the idea that in the 20th century, Beverly hills was a world run by commercial considerations and adoring of materialism. In the modern setting, ?Clueless? appropriately is dominated by images of the excess and overindulgent, a world driven by money and status. Essentially, it is like a atomic version of American society of that time. Heckerling has transformed the first few pages of Emma successfully by using techniques (such as camera shots and angles, music, dialogue, etc) and convey in consideration how values have greatly changed in the period between the 19th and 20th century, especially the values of marriage, social structure and the role of women. Even though the values have changed, Heckerling shows us that there are still universal things in the 20th century and Austen times, this is shown through the themes that Heckerling has inserted in opening of ?Clueless? that are the identical of the ones in ?Emma? (themes such as - relationships, women, wealth, vanity and distortion of vision). Even though Heckerling has changed/altered a few thing to match the context setting, the story while still seems to remain the same(p). Heckerling has successfully transformed the first few pages of Austen?s novel ?Emma? to the opening scene of ?Clueless? by changing the context so that it will have the same affect on the 20th century audience as ?Emma? did with the 19th audience. BIBLIOGRAPHY*http://community.boredofstudies.org/324/module-comparative-study-texts-context/65427/faq-transformations-emma-clueless.html If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment