Gave willingly to the company Essay

In my feature person-to-person experience I lay down that in Ikea there were many divorcees and single people. There were also an unusually high number of couples that had met done Ikea and then piece of worked together in the same building. Some of the divorcees openly blamed their relationship break-up on the fact that they work for Ikea their partners simply did not substantiate the commitment, in terms of prison term, that they gave willingly to the company.My own relationship with my partner started to stomach quite soon after the initial 3-month period, I had bonded with my new colleagues and I was enthusiastic and committed to this new way of working(a) my attitude to work and my commitment had changed in favour of Ikea (Festinger, 1957).As a manager it was assert that examples should be set by giving that little bit excess to help co-workers across the store, so for example if the tills were busy at the peculiarity of the evening it was an unspoken rule that all managers should stay until closing time to help clear the backlog of customers, this sometimes meant leaving the store an second and a half after the official end of the day.I found it difficult to go against the norm as everyone else appeared to take it for granted, I cute to leave at my normal time of 6.00pm but found it unsurmountable to do so when my colleagues were staying behind and helping out. Solomon Asch describes this type of behaviour as obedient (Gross, 1996 Ch 20) conforming to sort pressure. Festinger talks about the five conditions for change magnitude fervour in a belief following the disconfirmation of a belief, this is uniform to an example when a close friend of mine at Ikea (store manager) had been working hard and consequently there had been some irrevocable conflict indoors his marriage about the hypothecate and the expectations of Ikea.After his initial split with his married woman he dealt with her condemnation of Ikea by spreading the word of Ike a with increased vehemence and renewed passion, he saw the Ikea family as his support network and this assurance on the company and Ikea family members simply reinforced the belief in his ending (Festinger, 1959) of ending his marriage. On a similar personal level my job and my alliance to it became an increasing problem at home. My behaviour changed at home, I made excuses about going into work early and staying late.In the initial few months I found myself defending Ikea as I mat so close to my new colleagues and didnt want to let them down, moreover as time went on I realised that I confused the quality time with my partner and I saw that my priorities had become touch on by my commitment to work. At work I saw friends ripping up with their partners because of similar reasons and then justifying their action by criticising their relationship. This type of ecesis for their behaviour resembles what Festinger wrote about in When Prophecy Fails.Where dissonance is rationalise d through the support of your fellow believers (in this case fellow co-workers). After 12 months I bear on an injury that lead to a back operation and this period away from work (3 months) gave me time to reflect on my time there and started to work out how I had been influenced by the Ikea way and how I had conformed to this way incredibly fast. obligingness involves a change of behaviour or opinion in order of magnitude to fit in with a group. According to Crutchfield Conformity is a yielding to group pressure when there is no direct request to take after with the group. (Gross, 1996 479). However according to Zimbardo & Leippe Conformity is a change in belief or behaviour in response to real or imagined group pressure where there is no direct request to admit with the group norm. (Gross, 1996479). Majority influence is when a larger group influences a smaller group or individual. Although Asch was generally concerned with how one sewer resist majority influence and pr essure, his experiments are generally deemed to exhibit the situation of majority influence.Similar to the influence of the majority found in Ikea. gratuitous to say upon my return I decided to leave Ikea and 3 months subsequent I moved to another job with a different company. In the first few weeks I felt a great moxie of great loss almost a grief my regrets were thus twofold, I felt a regret of leaving the fold of Ikea and also a regret that conflicted with this and that was of not realising sooner my behavioural and attitude changes that had affect my personal life.In summing up this paper we have looked at Ikea and how its stopping point was aligned to sociological groups. We have covered the way of working deep down this organisation and how this relates to conformity and group influence again drawing parallels to similar sociological findings. It has been interesting journey to relate this instance where my own personal experience has been influenced by the belonging o f a group, especially a group with such strong cultural roots as Ikea.The analogies found in this paper make it more understandable as to how social influences tolerate have such wide-ranging affects on individuals. And how many situations (from the impact of TV on the masses through to major historical events such as the rise of Nazism) can arise. It certainly makes the self and our interaction with others food for thought.References(Festinger, 1957) Gross, 1996 448 cognitive dissonance theory. Gross, R. (1999). The Science of Mind and Behavior. (3rd Ed). Hodder & Stoughton. Press) (Festinger, 1959)