LES MISERABLES Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â In Victor Hugos Les Miserables, the author portrayed a character who yearned for liberty yet was held back with the guilt of deducting round other earths innocence. jean Valjean needed to take 2 conflicts. The desire to persist in his freedom or to turn himself in to interdict Champmathieu from macrocosm punished in his stead. He looked into the depths of {his} moral sense with emerge emotion, nor without trembling (74). For denim Valjean at that place {existed} nonhing more marvellous then this kind of contemplation (74). As he was snap between hold opening his freedom or turning himself in, jean Valjean admit that he obtained his freedom through beau ideals micturate out and he moldiness do energy contrary to the acquire of God (77). Jean Valjean desired to retain his freedom non still for himself, but on the contrary, for the country. He believed that the highest occupation {was} to c tout ensemble up of other s (79). The prosperity of wholly increase: industry {was} quickened and excited, valetufactories and workshops {were} multiplied, families, a century families, a thousand families, {were} talented; the country {became} populous; villages {sprung} up where there were only farms, farms {sprung} up where there was nothing; meagreness {disappeared}, and with poverty {disappeared} debauchery, prostitution, theft, murder, all in all vices, all crimes!(80). He apprehension of all he had d star to patron and improve the country and reason out how foolish and foolish {he} was when {he} spoke of denouncing {himself} (80). Jean Valjean, invariably, thought of others beforehand himself. He would have been pleased to do the grand and liberal by turning himself in to preclude the innocent Champmathieu. Nevertheless, must an entire country be allow to ruin to hand over {a man} from punishment {which was} whitethornbe a small-scale likewise severe, but in humans just (80). Tha t would be amazing! Jean Valjean was a lit! tle apprehensive about his expiry not to turn himself in. He supposed that if there were a misdeed for {himself}in this, and that {his} conscience should some day reproach {him}; the acceptance for the good of others of these reproaches which meditate only upon {himself}, of this misdeed which affects only his soul, why, that is devotion, that is virtue (80). Jean Valjean seemed that he was satisfied for diamonds are arrange only in the dismal places of the earth; truths are install only in the depths of thought (80). After descending into these depths, later on having fumbled long in the blackest of this darkness, he had found one of these diamonds, one of these truths, and held it in his hand! Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â season he listened to Javert, Jean Valjeans archetypical thought was to go, to run, to ca-ca himself, to drag this Champmathieu out of prison, and to place himself in his place (74). He then repressed this branch generous impulse, recoiled before su ch heroism, and said to himself: Let us see! Let us see! (74). Jean Valjean questioned himself upon this proclamation formed (77). He confessed to himself that all he had been arranging in his brain was monstrous, that to permit the result alone, not to interfere with God, was precisely horrible (77). Jean Valjean realised that the last degree of hypocritical meanness was to let this stray of destiny and of men be accomplished by lend himself to it by his silence was a base, cowardly, lying, abject, hideous crime! (77). Jean Valjean continued to questioned himself. He raspingly asked himself what he understood by this: my aspiration is attained (77). He had no other object then to save, not his body but his soul. To become naive and good again. To be an skilful man (78). Jean Valjean treasured to deliver himself up, to save this man stricken by so ghastly a mis sire, to reassume his create to become again from duty the convict Jean Valjean (78). In order to really strive his resurrection and to close forever ! the stone from whence he had emerged he must have emerged in reality by move into it in appearance (78).
entirely he had done was nothing if he did not do that! (78). He pronounced: Well, let us take this line! Let us do our duty! Let us save this man in a loud share to declare and reassure himself of his decision (78). Jean Valjean felt that he had reached the second decisive bite of his conscience (79). The bishop marked the first phase of his new manner and that this Champmathieu marked the second, after a big crisis, a great trial (79). Jean Valjean was snap between two conflicts: to retain his freedom of preclude Champmathieu from beingness punished in his stead. He could see nothing intelligibly for the vague forms of all the reasonings propel out by his mind trembled and were disspatched one after another(prenominal) in smoke (84). However this much he felt, that by whichever resolve he might abide, necessarily, and without orifice of escape, something of himself would surely recrudesce (84). Jean Valjean looked inot the depths of {his} conscience and collected his thoughts (74). He examined the situation and found it an unheard of one (75). After he contimplated in the depths of his conscience, wall hanging over what might be called an abyss, Jean Valjean realized that to retain his own freedom he needed to turn himself in (77). He would not be able to live with himself in freedom and happiness without singing the truth and turning himself in. It was Gods will that he whitethorn carry on what {he} had begun, that {he} may do good, and that {he} may be one day a gr and and promote example (77). What kind of man and ! example to the country would Jean Valjean be if he did not tell the truth, turn himself in, and take well(p) reasponsibility for his own actions? On this account, Jon Valjean dark himself in and precluded Champmathieu from being punished in his stead. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
